Padmavati, Existential Debate Continues

The film Padmavati is facing a lot of resistance. First, Rajput Karni sena had vandalised the set of Padmavati in early part of 2017. Now at the time of release of the film, different Rajput groups have vowed to oppose release and if necessary vandalise movie theatres that screen the movie. As debate around release of the film Padmavati becomes more and more intense, threats are being issued to actor and director of the film. One of the most versatile actress and a prolific director are being called names. All the time law and order machinery is staying unusually quiet. In this scenario, three issues coming out in forefront:

  1. Did Padmavati actually exist;
  2. Was Alauddin Khilji a benevolent administrator; and
  3. Is protest around screening the film correct;

A concerted effort is being made to establish Rani Padmini to be a fictitious character. One such article suggests, according to historians, there is no evidence that Padmavati ever existed. The character Padmavati was created by Malek Jayashi, a sufi poet in 1540:

The author goes on to argue that image of Padmini was further polished in Bengal in 19th century to boost resistance movement against colonial power

The story of Padmavati has survived for more than 700 years, at a time when there was hardly much communication. Most likely it had spread by word of mouth by bards and became a part of folklore.

Even if we accept that Malek Jayashi created Padmavati, could it not be possible that poet Jayashi got his idea from folk history? Padmavati is etched in peoples memory, how many have ever heard of Jayashi beyond exalted academic circles?

Even if it is accepted that in 19th century Bengal, Padmavati was used as a symbol of resistance against colonial powers, how did the message spread? Communication had hardly improved from days of Padmavati in 14th century. There was no internet, no e-mail, hardly any postal service, limited train service?

According to historians, three Jauhars had taken place in Chittorgarh. One in 1303, and two in 16th century. Tale of Rani Padmini has remained etched in the mind of people. Not many know of other two jauhar.

Many of us have heard the story in our childhood, may be in history books, in India of sixties and seventies, when India was ruled by centrist congress and not right wing BJP. Yet the story survived..

As part of physical evidence, there exist a Padmini palace, a jauhar kund in Chittorgarh. These sites are authenticated by Archaeological Survey of India as national monuments. Were these structures built after Padmini? Is there any evidence to this effect?

No one disputes existence of Rawal Rattan Singh. Rattan Singh had fought battle with Alauddin Khalji and lost. Amir Khusroo, who happened to accompany Alauddin Khalji to Chittor, claimed, Rana Rattan Singh had surrendered and his life was spared. Other historians disagree with this point of view. Because on that fateful day, Alauddin Khalji had slaughtered 30000 people of Chittor. There is no reason for victorious sultan to spared the life of a vanquished rana. Amir Khusroo never talked about Rani Padmavati. Would a court historian document failure of his master to attain his objective? That too a person who never cared sparing lives of Hindus and Muslims alike?

There is break in Sisodiya lineage,  that was started by Bappa Rawal, after Rawal Rattan Singh. Historians account for Mewar dynasty from 1326 onwards. What happened in 1303 and beyond can be authenticated by family members of Mewar royal family. One can find Sisodia family lineage on the net under Rajasthan Royalty. Kunwar Vishvapratap Singh, a member of royal family, has said on TV that Rani Padmini was his ancestor. He has also written a letter to I&B minister and Prime Minister on the matter.  Other kings of Bappa Rawal family existed, but historical records are scant.

In the event of doubt, who should we trust more? Historians or family member who claims Rani Padmavati was his ancestor?


Stories of a Rajput queen | The Indian Express

Khalji dynasty – Wikipedia

Udaipur (Princely State) Homepage with Pictures and Map : Rajput …

Padmavati Controversy: Rajasthan Royal Writes To PM Modi

8 thoughts on “Padmavati, Existential Debate Continues

Add yours

  1. Yours is very tidy article digging up the facts that needs to clarify before any more issues…those who are creating the ruckus I think doesn’t thought about this all because they are blindly following the leaders and all…thanks for sharing…


    1. Thank you for reading. One has to accept oral tradition of history. Many people that are agitating are brought up on these stories. So they are reacting. I think as a nation we need to take a balanced view. I also say, I do not support beheading of Bhansali, or chopping nose of Deepika. All these should be stopped by law and order machinery. As of today, one person was found hanging at Nahargarh fort in Jaipur. Is it murder or suicide, investigation will tell.


  2. I am from Rajasthan and our history books have always had the same tale of Padmavati that SLB portrays. I wonder why these people who agitate now never did in the last 40-50 years ? It has become a trend these days..a few politically connected people will start crazy agitations for their personal gains and others will follow blindly without even knowing what they are actually fighting for..


    1. As a non Rajput and a non Rajasthani, I have no say in Rajput history. If the lineage is continuing, then family members should be consulted about a film on their ancestors. At the same time reasonable artistic freedom should be granted to director. Whatever I have seen in promo, Rajput people came out looking good. I thought Alauddin Khalji may get bad name if the movie is allowed to release. I do not know if the film has a dream sequence. Director says there is none. Even if there is one, it is Alauddin dram not that of Rani. If a man can attack a kingdom, he certainly can dream. I agree there is ulterior motive behind hungama. That is the difficulty and challenge of India.


  3. I am not sure why Karni Sena and other outfits are so outrgaed about while women in their own city are still being killed at birth, not granted same opportunities and made to feel unsafe.


    1. I agree with you Karni Sena has come out looking very bad. Specially all the threats about chopping nose, beheading etc do not go down well at all in a rule based society. At the same time, this is the best they can do given someone they revere is allegedly been shown in a bad way. True many have not seen the movie. But director had apparently agreed to show the film before release. I guess members of Mewar Royal Family could have been part of initial screen. Finally abysmal female mortality, skewed sex ratio, poor female literacy etc cannot be reason not to hold another protest. More so if the cause appears more real.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog at

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: